Calling brand and performance enemies is the easiest brief in the room — it sounds decisive but mostly lets teams dodge nuance. When creatives, media buyers and analysts are told to pick sides, you get shouting brand spots that aren't tied to conversion moments and skinny performance units that can't scale without a halo. The real cost isn't philosophical: it's fractured budgets, duplicated effort and lost momentum across the funnel.
They aren't opposites; they're complementary verbs. Brand creates memory structures and frames meaning; performance activates and measures intent. A hero video that positions the product becomes the seed for shorter testimonial cuts that close. Ignore that link and you'll pay twice: once for awareness, again to chase customers who weren't primed to convert.
Here's a quick, non-magical playbook you can use tomorrow: Step 1: unify objectives into layered KPIs (reach + consideration + CPA) so teams optimize toward the same north star. Step 2: design a creative hierarchy — one adaptable hero asset plus 3–5 tactical variations optimized for platform and funnel stage. Step 3: measure with overlapping windows: run brand lift and short-term conversion tracking simultaneously, then reallocate weekly based on movement, not opinion. Small experiments beat big debates.
Stop writing lazy briefs that force a false feud. Try one integrated test (a sensible 30/70 or 50/50 split depending on maturity), track both brand lift and ROAS, and let the data end the argument. You'll save money, speed up learning, and finally build campaigns that do both things you actually care about.
Think of your campaign as a two‑lane road: widescreen, cinematic storytelling in the fast lane to build desire and memory, and a narrow, efficient service road downstream that collects clicks and converts. The trick is to let the top breathe — emotional rhythm, brand cues, curiosity — while the bottom gets surgical: proof, scarcity, clear next steps.
Treat creative like tempo: use longer sequences or episodic posts to seed belief and identity, then hit warmed audiences with short, action‑oriented assets. Fund reach and frequency where the story lives, then pivot spend to retargeting and conversion creative that removes friction and shortens the path to purchase.
Focus on three tactical levers when you split speeds:
Operationalize it: unify IDs, use time‑windowed bidding, set separate KPIs (CPM/CPV for story; CPA/ROAS for conversion), and rotate assets weekly. Run a 4‑week test with ~60% story / 40% conversion and you'll stop agonizing over tradeoffs — you'll get brand heat and measurable sales working together.
Think of creative as a Swiss Army knife for attention: one edge for recall, one edge for action. When a color flicker, sonic stinger, or signature gesture does double duty as a memory code and a CTA cue, the ad stops being a fleeting interruption and becomes a repeatable brand action. That is the trick: make the move that grabs attention also point the viewer to the next step.
Memory codes are the tiny design choices that register instantly — a tempo, a color cut, a five word phrase, a product motion. Actionable step: pick one dominant code per campaign and exaggerate it across formats so it becomes unmistakable. Keep the code consistent but flexible enough to fit 6s spots, 15s cutdowns, and social stories. Track recognition signals as well as clicks so the code is actually building memory, not just decoration.
CTAs that convert are not polite requests, they are integrated cues. Let the CTA mirror the memory code: animate the call to action in the same rhythm, place the verb where the eye lands during the code beat, or make the product gesture resolve into the button. Use micro CTAs that ask for a single, low friction behavior. Test creative variants where the CTA is part of the code versus tacked on afterwards to see which pattern scales.
Quick playbook to ship multitasking creative: 1) lock the memory code, 2) design three CTA hooks that echo that code, 3) produce matched cutdowns and map KPIs for conversion and cue recall. Report CPA, CTR, view through, and a one question recall metric. When creative is engineered to signal and to solicit in the same moment, campaigns stop sacrificing long term brand for short term wins and start compounding both.
Think of your marketing budget as a barbell: one heavy weight for the nearer-term, measurable wins and one for the long game that builds demand. When you lean 60/40, do it with rules, not hope. Put 60 percent behind direct-response campaigns that are tied to clear conversion signals and optimized daily, and 40 percent behind brand experiments that drive reach, recall, and emotional hooks that will make later conversions cheaper and more likely.
Operationalize the split with concrete lanes. Give the performance side tight audiences, high-intent creatives, and short learning windows with automated bids aimed at CPA or ROAS. Give the brand side broader audiences, storytelling creatives, and CPM buying or reach objectives. Tag creatives by lane so reporting stays clean, and treat brand assets as testbeds for creative concepts you can later adapt into performance ads.
Protect ROAS by measuring differently across time horizons. Expect immediate ROAS from the 60 percent and measure the 40 percent on lift metrics plus incremental conversions over 30 to 90 days. Use holdout groups or geo tests when possible so you see the true value of brand spend rather than just raw last-click. Blend results into a single dashboard so decision makers see both short-term efficiency and long-term growth potential.
Practical rules: rebalance monthly, not daily; move winning brand concepts into the performance pool after a validation period; cap frequency on reach buys to avoid waste; and keep a small creative pool for each lane to reduce variance. Done well, the barbell split stops the false choice between performance and brand and turns budget allocation into a growth engine that preserves ROAS while building future demand.
Speed matters: you need quick, defensible proof that creative is building demand while not bankrupting the business. Start by instrumenting two simple metrics from day one: Brand Lift via short in‑app or panel surveys, and Customer Acquisition Cost using the actual dollars that show up on your billing. When those two move in opposite directions you have a story; when they both move up, you have leverage.
Set up micro‑experiments that pair an exposed cohort with a matched holdout. Run 7‑to‑21 day bursts to capture early behavioral shifts and plug survey results into the same attribution window as your CAC. Use consistent naming conventions and a common ID for campaigns so creative level lift maps to cost per acquisition without manual spreadsheets. Small samples give fast signals; repeat often to separate noise from signal.
Build a one‑screen dashboard that answers the question: should we scale? Show three panels: a Brand Lift card with confidence intervals, a CAC trend with cohort masks, and a Tradeoff gauge that overlays lift per dollar. Add simple color rules and a recommended action column (Pause, Test, Scale). This keeps stakeholders aligned and avoids the endless debate where everyone brings a spreadsheet to a vote.
Deploy a 30‑day playbook: run three creatives, measure lift and CAC in parallel, pick the winner by the Tradeoff gauge, and reallocate spend weekly. Treat the dashboard as a living experiment log not a vanity metric shrine. If brand lift moves and CAC is acceptable, scale; if lift is up but CAC is bloated, optimize creative and audience rather than shutting off branding. Quick proof wins decisions and keeps both brand and performance happy.
Aleksandr Dolgopolov, 16 December 2025